BY J GARY DILAURA
I start this column with an explanation.
I wrote a fact-based column loaded with facts regarding the fact that the left wants to do away with fossil fuels, not because we have a replacement system ready to take over for the 85% of the grid electricity that fossil fuels produce.
OR that there is a better, cleaner, more reliable, cheaper way to produce electricity… a commodity that we CANNOT live without.
Nor is it because they have a plan!
I’ll speak to that later, but I welcomed comments to what I wrote, but asked if you would like to comment…so I can answer your comments…first define “Climate”…
Then, explain of those things, elements, that define “Climate”… what part or parts of those elements you believe we can control…simple!
My critic, Mr. James Hufnagel referred to a PHD at MIT for his expert information.
Well, here’s the petition that 31,487 American scientists signed, which included 9,029 Phd’s in fields relating to science;
“We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.
“There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.”
This petition was given to Congress. Since its signing, thousands more have joined!
Someone who cannot define Climate or Climate Change should not criticize the opinion of somebody who might know a little more than he does, especially if he can’t even define the topic of discussion!
After almost three decades in law enforcement and testifying on the stand under oath…the one thing we learned quickly is that defense attorneys are taught, “If you can’t attack the facts, attack the witness.”
Well, this witness does his homework and vets everything he writes.
Note too, I don’t attack the other person because you cannot win an argument with someone who knows absolutely nothing about the topic of which he speaks…he can’t even define what he wants!
I have a science background (metallurgist) and actually became knowledgeable in environmental crimes and related things, Clean Air, Clean Water, etc., because the FBI directed me to create, initiate, and implement the Environmental Crimes program for the Western District of NY and all 17 Counties! Which I did successfully!
Maybe my critic will believe the former president and cofounder of Greenpeace, if he knows what that is…;
Statement of Patrick Moore, Ph.D. before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, Subcommittee on Oversight
February 25, 2014
“Natural Resource Adaptation: Protecting ecosystems and economies”
“Chairman Whitehouse, Ranking Member Inhofe, and members of the Committee. Thank you for the opportunity to testify at today’s hearing.
“In 1971, as a PhD student in ecology, I joined an activist group in a church basement in Vancouver, Canada and sailed on a small boat across the Pacific to protest US hydrogen bomb testing in Alaska.
“We became Greenpeace. After 15 years in the top committee, I had to leave, as Greenpeace took a sharp turn to the political left, and began to adopt policies that I could not accept from my scientific
perspective. Climate change was not an issue when I abandoned Greenpeace, but it certainly is now.
“There is no scientific proof that human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) are the dominant cause of the minor warming of the Earth’s atmosphere over the past 100 years. If there were such a proof, it would be written down for all to see. No actual proof, as it is understood in science, exists.”
“The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) states: ‘It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century.
“’Extremely likely’ is not a scientific term, but rather a judgment, as in a court of law. The IPCC defines ‘extremely likely’ as a ’95-100% probability.’ But upon further examination, it is clear that these numbers are not the result of any mathematical calculation or statistical analysis.
“They have been ‘invented’ as a construct within the IPCC report to express ‘expert judgment,’ as determined by the IPCC contributors…”
Oddly enough, John Coleman, cofounder of the Weather Channel, came to the EXACT same conclusion!
What happened next confirmed everything WE have been saying all along and continue to say about the fraud imposed on us and fossil fuel, Global Warming and the cause of Climate Change, a phrase nobody seems able to define!
What others, like yours truly, have been saying for years, was finally revealed at the 2015 Paris Accord on “Global Warming”.
During that accord, NASA released their study on Antarctic ice land mass, which stated that after thousands of borings to measure the difference of temperature and thickness of the ice over the past 10,000 years, the results are amazing!
That report can be found all over the internet. It destroyed (in my opinion), any credibility the UN IPCC Model may have had.
The report revealed that the Antarctic ice pack is thicker, larger and COLDER than 10,000 years ago.
NASA also studied the “18 year Global Model”, the UNIPCC created to predict Climate Change, and reported it is inaccurate and “predicts nothing.”
The left used this “Model” to predict temperature changes, along with other things, like the melting of the Arctic glaciers.
Al Gore used it to make his famous “the glaciers will be melted by 2015, polar bears are dying, and Manhattan will be flooded” speech!
As a direct result of the NASA study, members of the UNIPCC resigned and reported, in essence, that they were cooking the books regarding the temperature numbers.
That information was released, made public, during the Paris Accord and at the Paris Accord and amazingly just faded away as if nothing happened…they just found out that the UN IPCC data is a fraud…and they said, “OH well,…next?”!
John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel, took it upon himself to compare the actual temperatures of the IPCC Model, as I noted above, over the time period the model covered, and compared the actual temperatures to what the model predictions were, as the NASA report disclosed, no correlation.
I interviewed Mr. Coleman several times and learned more about the way the Global Warming data was falsified.
Mr. Coleman also made public his findings; they are also on the internet. He found the, “polar bears are dying,” to be another lie.
The polar bear population is bigger, healthier than they were when the various agencies began keeping records!!
Regarding the hypocrisy regarding fossil fuels and what the radical left wants you to believe, Patrick Moore also revealed, when he resigned from Green Peace, that the “great ship lolly pop”, my words…actually the “Rainbow Warrior”…the Green Peace ship(s).…is a sail boat he NEVER saw use its sails! It turns out, he reports, the SAIL BOAT is actually another lie.
It uses a huge diesel generator to produce ELETRICITY to power the 2 electromotive motors!
Don’t believe it? Read this from an Australia News Paper…
Greenpeace’s Rainbow Warrior Cruises the Gab Powered by diesel
“Greenpeace has been making waves in the Great Australian Bight (GAB) recently, using its (diesel-fueled) Rainbow Warrior III ship to lead a flotilla of petroleum-based surfboards, paddleboards, yachts and powered boats in Port Lincoln to protest oil exploration.
“It’s a bold stance to rebuke an industry with the potential to provide many jobs, infrastructure and services to the region, so Greenpeace’s own green-creds must be solid, right? Well, not quite.
“Greenpeace is quick to boast that the Rainbow Warrior III is ‘as sustainable as possible,’ despite the fact that it is still ultimately dependent on fossil fuels. It’s engine, a Volvo Penta D65A MT 1850 HP, is a diesel-electric motor that uses fuel at the rate of 206 g/kWh of power as Greenpeace activists cruise it all over the world to protest the very resource its dependent on.
“This hypocrisy has been widely noted and the public record is rife with photos of the ship being refueled by oil companies, including BP, which has often borne the brunt of Greenpeace’s campaigns.”
Green Peace activists aren’t really what they claim to be.
Okay, now the PLAN…why in the world would anybody do things to weaken America in a purposeful manner?!
Now if you Democrats believe Obama and Obiden reduced our strength in so many ways to Protect, Preserve and Defend this Nation, you need to pull your heads out of that dark place you have them stuck so your ears pop free!
If you had to fight a stronger power, how would you do it…I’ll give you a hint…Pearl Harbor!
Our Grid is the NEW Pearl Harbor, as is the Internet and Digital Dollars! There are many things happening that you are aware of, but disregard as…oh well!
I’ll name some events…things…and I want you to start putting them together…
Obama closed most of your coal fired plants, many oil fired and natural gas electric power plants…why? In 2008, when Obama took power, he had 125% of Grid available that’s if all AC units were running, we had 25% in reserve…not any more. When he left power, he had already decimate our grid to the point where brownouts were common across the US…google it!
He succeeded in reducing our grid to 85% of capacity, hence…brownouts!
He shut down our NORAD alert/response “go to” safe house in the Colorado Mountains…but under political pressure and against his will, he was forced to reopen NORAD. That is one of the very, very few bullet proof, nuclear bomb proof ways we have to communicate with your Trident Submarine Fleet!
Obiden shut down, according to the Oil companies over 7,500 oil leases, the Key Stone and other pipelines, and is trying to shut down the Colonial.
To the point where we went from exporting oil to OPEC, to begging oil from OPEC…why? By going from 16 million barrels a day to less than 10 million? Why would a president do that …what’s the benefit to us…$5 a gallon for gas or diesel is not a benefit…and if you believe that’s a benefit, then did you know chickens have lips and the moon is made out of blue cheese?
By the way, I personally heard the comment Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand made about the Keystone not pumping 10 cents worth of oil!
Obiden opened the freaking borders. I worked the northern border with my buddies from the Border Patrol and still see them regularly.
You don’t want to know what they are dealing with…it’s pure insanity, and Mayorkas must be impeached and charged with criminal negligence, and not staying true to his Oath of Office!
In my opinion and many others, Obama is behind everything Biden is doing, and it has nothing to do with protecting you and me.
I believe there is a coup that will begin with a complete loss of electric power…followed by fuel, food, water. Then a demand for your guns, in return for electric power.
If you think that’s farfetched, why do you think they started and are pushing for a fossil fuel stoppage? To save the environment?
At what cost? Even if, to continue living the way we are is hurting the environment, which is not even possible, is it worth no food, no water, no heat, total loss of our way of life and ability to protect yourself?
I THINK NOT!